RE: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

[=?utf-8?B?5pu+6buO5piO?= <tsenglm@cc.ncu.edu.tw>]

Dear James:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-idn@ops.ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of James Seng/Personal
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 7:31 AM
> To: tsenglm@計網中心.中大.tw; Erin Chen
> Cc: liana Ye; idn@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified 
> Chinese Conversion[version01]
> 
> 
> >         The  original (SC, TC) pair is keep for checking reference ,
> but if
> > one character has different meanning and usage in different 
> CJK area,
> the
> > relation of 1-1 mapping can be  reduced to checking-state to let CJK
> people
> > can keep their local need and also to match the ALL-SC, ALL-TC
> approach.
> 
> Okay, let me try to see if I can get this right on the table mappings:
> 
> 1. The original source of the table mapping is from A 
> Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters and Dictonary 
> of Chinese Characters Variant.
> 
The Authority of  Complete List of Simplified Chinese Characters is PRC government, It MUST  be keep.  The  draft  reference it .
> 2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into 
> a single tables.
> 
> 3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with 
> Japanese & Korean pairs from the tables.
> 
> If these are true, then JET could be considered as the 
> authority for the tables mappings. 
       The implied result is not correct . The original authority of  this SC/TC mapping table can not be changed by referencer. 

L.M.Tseng