[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
There have been previous updates to the requirement levels of the
cryptographic algorithms for DNSSEC (RFC 3110 updating RFC2535 for example).
There has been previous talk on this list regarding dropping DSA as a
mandatory to implement algorithm. Instead of writing a whole RFC just to
propose making DSA optional and RSA/SHA1 the only required algorithm, it
would be nice to seek consensus here.
In other words, the new algorithm table from 2535 and 3110 would look like:
code name
0 reserved
1 RSA/MD5 NOT RECOMMENDED
2 D-H OPTIONAL
3 DSA OPTIONAL
4 ECC(reserved) OPTIONAL
5 RSA/SHA1 REQUIRED
6-251 available for assignment
252 indirect OPTIONAL
253 private
254 private
255 reserved
Q: Is the change of DSA to OPTIONAL acceptable? That will leave only
RSA/SHA1 as the only mandatory to implement algorithm.
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>