[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSECRRs?

To: Scott Rose <scottr@nist.gov>
Subject: Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSECRRs?
From: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@crt.se>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:39:15 +0100 (CET)
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <007c01c2d1c9$5da52190$b9370681@barnacle>
References: <007c01c2d1c9$5da52190$b9370681@barnacle>

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Scott Rose wrote:

> Q:  Should the text in the Resource Records draft of the DNSSEC spec be
> changed to indicated that name compression "SHOULD NOT" be used when
> sending security RRs over the wire?

yes, but I would prefer a MUST NOT.

	jakob

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
  - From: Mark.Andrews@isc.org

References:
- Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
  - From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>

Prev by Date: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
Next by Date: Re: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
Previous by thread: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
Next by thread: Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread