[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?

To: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@crt.se>
Subject: Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
From: Mark.Andrews@isc.org
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:11:30 +1100
Cc: Scott Rose <scottr@nist.gov>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:39:15 BST." <Pine.OSX.4.52.0302111438240.21493@criollo.schlyter.pp.se>

> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Scott Rose wrote:
> 
> > Q:  Should the text in the Resource Records draft of the DNSSEC spec be
> > changed to indicated that name compression "SHOULD NOT" be used when
> > sending security RRs over the wire?
> 
> yes, but I would prefer a MUST NOT.
> 
> 	jakob
> 
seconded.
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@isc.org

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSECRRs?
  - From: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@crt.se>

Prev by Date: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: IPv6 Name Auto Registration
Next by Date: Re: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
Previous by thread: Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSECRRs?
Next by thread: Re: Q1: Should we allow name compression in the RDATA of DNSSEC RRs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread