[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
At 12.02.2003 09:37 +0100, Olaf M. Kolkman wrote:
>My over-engineering-flag is raised as well; If RSA get's compromised
>the DNS is the least of my worries... If RSA get's compromised I can
>live with an unsecured DNS tree... just as I can live with it today.
>
>In other words: "You do not have to outrun the bear as long as you
>outrun the other guy" and if RSA is compromised there are other guys
>than DNS that are a much tastier game.
>
Sooo true!!
Med vennlig hilsen | Best regards,
Kåre Presttun
Tel.: +47 4100 4908
mailto:Kare@Presttun.org
http://www.presttun.org/kare/
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>