[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
Subject: RE: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:54:15 -0800
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
References: <CE541259607DE94CA2A23816FB49F4A310FF6C@vhqpostal6.verisign.com>

> If as appears to be the case these are all editorial issues that can
> be dealt with in the normal post-last call process, should we wait for
> an updated draft before going into last call or consider the period 
> prior to Feb 12th as being a preamble to last call and deal with all 
> the issues at once?

as usual, we will wait for a draft that is as good as we know it

randy


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- RE: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
  - From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
Next by Date: Re: Q2: crypto algorithm requirements for DNSSEC
Previous by thread: RE: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
Next by thread: RE: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread