[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in

To: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
From: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:57:08 -0800
Cc: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>,"'Roy Arends'" <roy@logmess.com>,Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>,Ólafur Gudmundsson/DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>,namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3A4D137C-3F81-11D7-B108-000393DB42B2@nominum.com>

Sigh.

<embarrassment>
So I said:

On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 10:30  AM, David Conrad wrote:

Nominum has a delegation only opt-in validator implementation in our proprietary caching server.

Turns out, I lied. The only implementation of an opt-in validator I'm aware of is the one Brian did for BINDv9.

Oops.
</embarrassment>

However, the question still stands:

Has anyone else written a validator that supports opt-in?

Rgds,
-drc


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- Re: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
  - From: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>

Prev by Date: Re: DNSSEC Opt-In Q: unsigned delegations with opt-in NXTs?
Next by Date: Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: RFC1886bis-01
Previous by thread: Re: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
Next by thread: Re: Summary RE: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Opt-in
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread