Re: axfr-clarify's fraudulent claims of consensus

[mw-list-namedroppers@csi.hu]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 02:51:55PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> See me not care. Almost all RFCs are mutually contradictory. This is not
> math, and even there we have Goedel. 

You certainly did not mean to refer to Godel in this context.  But
even if you did not, the above one and and a half lines are for the
books: how to lucidly express a healthy ignorance in math and,
simultaneously, come out of the closet and expose your opinion that
logic has no place in evaluating RFCs.

> Your software does not know about zones, it appears. 

It appears as in "it appears by running, and testing it on my box in
the last few months", or as in "it appears in my mind right now so
that I can go on with the rant that follows" ?

But seriously: are you serious?  Could you at least try to be by
avoiding soap opera words like "hate" and "stupid" and search for more
grown up versions?

Thx,

---
Mate Wierdl | Dept. of Math. Sciences | University of Memphis  


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>