[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [LLMNR] Use of IPv6 link-local multicast addresses [Potential newissue]

To: Mika Liljeberg <mika.liljeberg@welho.com>
Subject: Re: [LLMNR] Use of IPv6 link-local multicast addresses [Potential newissue]
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:52:35 +0859 ()
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org, lmnr-editors@internaut.com
In-reply-to: <1047122694.2472.77.camel@devil> from Mika Liljeberg at "Mar 8,2003 01:24:55 pm"

Mika;

> It would seem much better to just have a single well-known IPv6
> link-local multicast address for reverse lookups. The alternative would
> seem to be to not support PTR queries at all for IPv6 addresses.

It is enough to have a few (link local or global) anycast addresses
for any DNS lookups.

							Masataka Ohta

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- [LLMNR] Use of IPv6 link-local multicast addresses [Potential newissue]
  - From: Mika Liljeberg <mika.liljeberg@welho.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [LLMNR] Use of IPv6 link-local multicast addresses [Potentialnew issue]
Next by Date: DNSSEC (and secure .nl) mini HOWTO
Previous by thread: Re: [LLMNR] Use of IPv6 link-local multicast addresses [Potentialnew issue]
Next by thread: [LLMNR] Conflict resolution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread