[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nsec++

[On 04 Dec, @15:16, Andrew wrote in "RE: nsec++ ..."]
> Hi,
> 
> While not wishing to reopen (too much) the debate about how to encode this
> efficiently, I have a suggestion which might make the encoding of sparse NSEC

Uhm.... I _just_ finished the parsing of the previous nsec definition...

I think we don't want to make the NSEC more difficult than it already is
(compared to the NXT definition). 

So I would vote to keep the current NSEC definition as it as and get used to 
the fact is takes up a few more bytes,

grtz Miek

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>