[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nsec-01, bit 0

To: namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@ripe.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:03:35 +0100
In-reply-to: Message from Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net> of "Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:45:37 +0100." <20031210144537.GA29608@atoom.net>

 * Bit 0 in the first bitmap in the first window does not encode for any=20
 * RR. Shouldn't this bit get a status of reserved in the draft? Or doesn't
 * it matter if it's 1 or 0.


This is "Silly State" again :-) (that issue is closed)

See
http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2003/msg01851.html


--Olaf
  DNSEXT Chair

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nsec-01, bit 0
  - From: Roy Arends <roy@logmess.com>
- Re: nsec-01, bit 0
  - From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>

References:
- nsec-01, bit 0
  - From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>

Prev by Date: nsec-01, bit 0
Next by Date: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Previous by thread: nsec-01, bit 0
Next by thread: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread