[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nsec-01, bit 0

To: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:17:14 +0100
Cc: namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200312101503.hBAF3Zwp017642@birch.ripe.net>
Mail-followup-to: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@ripe.net>, namedroppers <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
References: <20031210144537.GA29608@atoom.net> <200312101503.hBAF3Zwp017642@birch.ripe.net>
User-agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux

[On 10 Dec, @16:03, Olaf wrote in "Re: nsec-01, bit 0 ..."]
> 
>  * Bit 0 in the first bitmap in the first window does not encode for any=20
>  * RR. Shouldn't this bit get a status of reserved in the draft? Or doesn't
>  * it matter if it's 1 or 0.
> 
> 
> This is "Silly State" again :-) (that issue is closed)

ah, *duh*

grtz
      Miek

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

References:
- nsec-01, bit 0
  - From: Miek Gieben <miekg@atoom.net>
- Re: nsec-01, bit 0
  - From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@ripe.net>

Prev by Date: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Next by Date: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Previous by thread: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Next by thread: Re: nsec-01, bit 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread