[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
question about dnssec-protocol-04
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-protocol-04, section 2.3 has the following
paragraph:
An NSEC record (and its associated RRSIG RRset) MUST NOT be the only
RRsets at any particular owner name. That is, the signing process
MUST NOT create (or RRSIG) RRs for owner names nodes which were not
the owner name of any RRset before the zone was signed.
[There is an editing nit here, too: s/MUST NOT create (or/MUST NOT create
NSEC (or/, I think.]
I feel sure that I have just forgotten the discussion about this, but why
does this restriction exist? What harm would NSEC records of this sort
cause?
It is true that I cannot think of any useful reason to do this, but
forbidding such NSEC records should have some real problem associated with
it.
--
David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
Sr. Engineer Verisign Applied Research
--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>