Mail Index
- Remarks on opt-in-09, was Re: Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Publication request raft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-05
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Publication request draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Remarks on draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- additions to dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: DNSv2 comment in Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSv2 comment in Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSv2 comment in Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- DNSv2 comment in Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: Jay Daley <jay@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Jay Daley <jay@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Noah's principle
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: Noah's principle
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Noah's principle
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Danny Mayer <mayer@gis.net>
- Re: 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location Record
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- 2929bis RRTYPE Allocation for the ENUM Branch Location Record
- From: Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-2929bis-04.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- DNSEXT IETF-67 meeting minutes
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Wrap-up trustupdate timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Danny Mayer <mayer@gis.net>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: SO vs DNSSEC
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- SO vs DNSSEC
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- An argument from a contrarian point of view (was: Pimping DNSSEC)
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: brain cycles of the WG
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- brain cycles of the WG
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- peace
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bmanning@karoshi.com
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- RE: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Pimping DNSSEC (was Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.)
- From: Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org>
- Re: Back to Ohta's old proposal (Was: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Back to Ohta's old proposal (Was: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- DNSEXT list policy
- From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-05.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- RE: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-04.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org>
- Re: Trustworthiness rules
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Trustworthiness rules
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Trustworthiness rules
- From: gson@araneus.fi (Andreas Gustafsson)
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Josh Littlefield <joshl@cisco.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Suresh Krishnaswamy <suresh@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: DNSSEC-lite - thoughts
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Suresh Krishnaswamy <suresh@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Scott Rose <scottr@nist.gov>
- Re: DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Shane Kerr <Shane_Kerr@isc.org>
- Re: DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- DNSSEC - Signature Only vs the MX/A issue.
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- DNSSEC - Application use of Provable non-existence
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- DNSSEC - Off-tree signatures
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- DNSSEC - Intermediate Validation - Good or bad idea?
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- DNSSEC-lite - thoughts
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- Re: Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
- Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: Wrap-up trustupdate timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNSEXT WGLC Summary: RFC2929bis
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: Wrap-up trustupdate timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Wrap-up trustupdate timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Wrap-up rollover requirements
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- dnsext-relax-gratuitous-tsig
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNAME questions
- From: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Relaxing Gratuitous TSIG Requirement comments
- From: Brian Wellington <Brian.Wellington@nominum.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.10]: Synthesized CNAME TTL=0
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis - templates and guidelines
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: Stefan Schmidt <zaphodb@zaphods.net>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis - templates and guidelines
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: NSEC3 and dynamic update issues.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- DNSEXT list policy
- From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: New working group document ?
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- New working group document ?
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.9]: Name Compression in RDATA
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNAME [4.8]: DNAME and CIDR Blocks in in-addr.arpa
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- NSEC3 and dynamic update issues.
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Fwd: note the boilerplate change
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-eastlake-dnsext-cookies-01.txt
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: dnssec-bis-updates-04 qtype any DO bit
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-08.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-04.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- DDNS-DHCP RFCs
- From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
- RFC 4701 on A DNS Resource Record (RR) for Encoding Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Information (DHCID RR)
- From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
- IETF-57 draft agenda has been posted
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-08.txt
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-08.txt
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-08.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-08.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: comments on trustupdate-timers-04
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly-00.txt
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Fwd: Last Call: 'DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV)' to Informational RFC (draft-weiler-dnssec-dlv)
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly-00.txt
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- FYI: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-stjohns-dnssec-sigonly-00.txt
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: DNAME [4.8]: DNAME and CIDR Blocks in in-addr.arpa
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNAME [4.14]: Small Corner Cases
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNAME [4.13]: PTR Records and DNAME
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: "Hilarie Orman" <hilarie@purplestreak.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.3]: DNAME is Always Included in Outgoing Packets.
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Robert Story <rstory@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNAME [4.3]: DNAME is Always Included in Outgoing Packets.
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- comments on trustupdate-timers-04
- From: Lindy Foster <lindy@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNAME update draft
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME update draft
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME update draft
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNAME update draft
- From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
- Re: DNAME [4.8]: DNAME and CIDR Blocks in in-addr.arpa
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: DNAME [4.11]: Wildcarded DNAME
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: DNAME [4.9]: Name Compression in RDATA
- From: Peter Koch <pk@denic.de>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- DNAME [4.14]: Small Corner Cases
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.13]: PTR Records and DNAME
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.12]: NSEC3 and DNAME
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.11]: Wildcarded DNAME
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.10]: Synthesized CNAME TTL=0
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.9]: Name Compression in RDATA
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.8]: DNAME and CIDR Blocks in in-addr.arpa
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.7]: A DNAME is not a Zone-cut
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.6]: Signaling of DNAME Understanding
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.5]: DNSSEC
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.4]: MX and NS Records Require that the DNAME in their RDATA is Canonical
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.3]: DNAME is Always Included in Outgoing Packets.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.2]: DNAME Apex is not Redirected Itself
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME [4.1]: DNAME as a Delegation Tool
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- DNAME update draft
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: bmanning@karoshi.com
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: bmanning@karoshi.com
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: "G. S. Marzot" <giovanni.marzot@sparta.com>
- NSEC3 Issue 27: creating a flag octet.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: bmanning@karoshi.com
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Suresh Krishnaswamy <suresh@tislabs.com>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: bmanning@karoshi.com
- draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: Lindy Foster <lindy@tislabs.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: char sample <charz_work@yahoo.com>
- RE: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Griffin, Wesley" <Wes.Griffin@sparta.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: char sample <charz_work@yahoo.com>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: LOC
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- Re: more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: LOC
- From: wayne <wayne@schlitt.net>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- more ambiguity (was Re: LOC)
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: LOC
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: LOC
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: LOC
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: LOC
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: LOC
- From: Chris Thompson <cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: LOC
- From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: LOC
- From: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
- Re: LOC
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- DNSEXT list policy
- From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: Scott Rose <srose@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: humid IPv6 addresses
- From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@int-evry.fr>
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: "dr. W.C.A. Wijngaards" <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: humid IPv6 addresses
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- 2nd NSEC3 workshop draft report
- From: Scott Rose <srose@verisignlabs.com>
- humid IPv6 addresses
- From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@int-evry.fr>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-00.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: Scott Rose <srose@verisignlabs.com>
- WGLC on trustudpate-timers
- From: "dr. W.C.A. Wijngaards" <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- WGLC on rollover-requirements and trustudpate-timers
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-rollover-requirements-03.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: DNSEXT call for agenda items
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSEXT call for agenda items
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- RFC 4471 on Derivation of DNS Name Predecessor and Successor
- From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- DNSEXT call for agenda items
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: gson@araneus.fi (Andreas Gustafsson)
- Re: nsec3 and update
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-04.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: nsec3 and update
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Re: nsec3 and update
- From: Scott Rose <srose@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: [dnsop] Re: [dnssec-deployment] BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: [dnssec-deployment] BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- BIND and OpenSSL's RSA signature forging issue
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- nsec3 and update
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- NSEC3PARAMS and UPDATE
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Scott Rose <srose@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-03 - Last Pass
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: leading zeros, odd digit counts in salt
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: leading zeros, odd digit counts in salt
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- DNSEXT list policy
- From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
- RFC 4635 on HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm) TSIG Algorithm Identifiers
- From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-07.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Last Call: 'DNSSEC Opt-In' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-opt-in)
- From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Last Call: 'DNSSEC Experiments' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments)
- From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-07
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: gson@araneus.fi (Andreas Gustafsson)
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- NSEC3, UPDATE and adding/removing a zone cut
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: "Rose, Scott" <srose@verisign.com>
- Re: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- RE: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: "Rose, Scott" <srose@verisign.com>
- Re: UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- UPDATE and NSEC3 parameter transitions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9, update
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Sam Weiler <weiler@tislabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9, update
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 9, update
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- NSEC3 Issue 9, update
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- RE: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 19, revisited.
- From: Wes Hardaker <hardaker@tislabs.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 19, revisited.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: "Olaf M. Kolkman" <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 19, revisited.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- NSEC3 Issue 23: dealing with unknown hashes
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- NSEC3 Issue 19, revisited.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- NSEC3 Issue 11, revisited.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: closest provable encloser vs closest encloser
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- nsec3 and unknown hash algorithms
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: closest provable encloser vs closest encloser
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: closest provable encloser vs closest encloser
- From: Wouter Wijngaards <wouter@NLnetLabs.nl>
- closest provable encloser vs closest encloser
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-mdns-47.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- RE: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.)
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.)
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.)
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.)
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Hashed/name collision (Was Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.)
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- CLASS, was RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-06
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- draft-ietf-dnsext-nsec3-06
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- updated: Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Chris Thompson <cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Larson, Matt" <mlarson@verisign.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- RE: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Matt Larson <mlarson@verisign.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- 11.3. NSEC-to-NSEC3 transition Considerations
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Removing the SERVFAIL response on hash collisions.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: Namedroppers moderation announcement
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-03 - Last Pass
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- RE: OASIS and new RR types
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Namedroppers moderation announcement
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: nsec3
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Julian Mehnle <julian@mehnle.net>
- Re: nsec3
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- nsec3
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- RE: OASIS and new RR types
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- RE: OASIS and new RR types
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Re: RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- RFC proposal on DNS spoofing prevention
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- Minimalist TAK automated rollover procedure in DNS resolver
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- Re: OASIS and new RR types
- From: David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>
- OASIS and new RR types
- From: "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- test
- From: "Roger Yerbanga" <roger.yerbanga@afribonemali.net>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- DNSEXT66 minutes
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Kevin Darcy <kcd@daimlerchrysler.com>
- Bad handling of DNS responses over TCP.
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@sunet.se>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- superwildcards poc code.
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- DNSEXT list policy
- From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
- Re: Comments on dr
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: Comments on dr
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: David Blacka <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- Re: Comments on dr
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Comments on dr
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: DNS zone file format (Was: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
- DNS zone file format (Was: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- Re: timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
- timers draft and parent DS records
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: Notes on DNSSEC key rollover
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- RE: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Notes on DNSSEC key rollover
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Notes on DNSSEC key rollover
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Julian Mehnle <julian@mehnle.net>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Notes on DNSSEC key rollover
- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
- Re: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: Robert Story <rstory@sparta.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- Re: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- Re: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
- Re: 3 comments on timers-03
- From: Mike StJohns <Mike.StJohns@nominum.com>
- 3 comments on timers-03
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- RE: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- pushing the limits of DNS Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: "dr. W.C.A. Wijngaards" <wouter@nlnetlabs.nl>
- Re: a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RFC 4592 on The Role of Wildcards in the Domain Name System
- From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- a suggestion for super-wildcards
- From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
- RE: [ietf-dkim] The URL to my paper describing the DKIM policy options
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: "Stuart E. Schechter" <ses@ll.mit.edu>
- Re: NSEC3 Issue 18: signalling complete NSEC3 chains
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Peter Koch <pk@DENIC.DE>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2929bis
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: Evaluating DNSSEC Transition Mechanisms
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
- 2nd NSEC3 workshop, 18-20 September 2006
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-timers-03.txt
- From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- RE: New DSA key sizes RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- RE: New DSA key sizes RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
- From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: Roy Arends <roy@nominet.org.uk>
- RE: New DSA key sizes RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: comments on rollover-requirements-02
- From: Suresh Krishnaswamy <suresh@tislabs.com>
- Re: clarification...Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: "Howard J. Eland" <heland@afilias.info>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
- RE: clarification...Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: "Scott Rose" <scottr@nist.gov>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt review
- From: "Eastlake III Donald-LDE008" <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: Kenji Rikitake <kenji.rikitake@acm.org>
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward
- From: albertof_mtzherrera@itesm.mx
- Re: Key Rollover: proposed way forward