[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RADEXT charter for comment...
In the interest of focus, I think it would be ok to have a separate
Diameter document. Is there a volunteer to write that document?
I don't think focus should override the technically right way
to do things, particularly when...
And finally, wouldnt NASREQ automatically handle the WLAN RADIUS attributes?
Right. It does. At least for 99.9% of the cases. The remaining
0.1% is designing something in RADIUS which already exists
in some other form in Diameter, and making the translation
So I think that one document leads to exactly one way to
do things, one set of information, and less industry
I and others have previously agreed to review these documents
and provide Diameter guidance (if needed). So I don't think
lack of Diameter understanding should be a problem in developing
the WLAN documents. If there's any problem in developing these
documents, it may be agreement on exactly what information
needs to be carried, but that's another issue...
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.