[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Is it okay to break RADIUS? (was RADIUS V2)
I don't think you have consensus on this issue David.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, David [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:39 PM
> To: Avi Lior; email@example.com
> Subject: RE: Is it okay to break RADIUS? (was RADIUS V2)
> Avi Lior writes...
> > Oh please!!!
> > After months of telling me and others that our "sub-types"
> > breaking RADIUS - when they were clearly NOT.
> Given the definition of "break" that we were using at that
> time (maintaining compatibility with data dictionary driven
> implementations) and given that there was no standard method
> of encapsulating sub-types within IETF standard attributes, I
> think my previous statements were accurate.
> > You of all people should not make statements such as this.
> I fear you are starting to personalize the issues. I am
> relaying a statement of the current WG and charter direction
> as driven by the IESG, in my capacity of Co-Chair. This is
> one of those "tell it like it is" statements. I see no
> reason why you should feel me disqualified to pass along this
> -- Dave
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.