[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Thanks Bernrad. As I recall the Liason that we sent from WFA to IETF
contained the following:
1) Access network location information
- covered by combined adrangi and jones draft soon to be submitted
to GeoPriv WG. GeoPriv chairs are expecting this draft.
2) Access network Bandwidth parameters
- covered by combined adrangi and black/congdon draft which is
currently being discussed on the mailing list. Will submit a new
version by the end this month
3) billing class of Service
- I believe "IP address type" attribute in the "lan attribute
extension" draft covers this. At least, this was the case when we
discussed this in WFA sometime ago!
4) There are a couple of other security key related attributes which are
not covered by any drafts -- to best of my understanding.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 8:54 PM
> To: Adrangi, Farid
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: RADEXT Agenda, Take One
> > I think we should add
> > nsion-00.txt to the agenda as well.
> > I believe WFA radius requirements
> > are captured in a different document (in Excel spreadsheet
> format) --
> > and that document does not propose any format/syntax for these
> > attributes.
> I wasn't sure whether the Excel spreadsheet was a public
> document or not.
> In any case, the reference was put in as a placeholder. We
> have a liaison
> request from the WFA relating to those attributes, so I'm anticipating
> that a draft will be submitted defining them.
> Or am I missing something?
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.