[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -01 version of Chargeable User Identity
> > I agree. So, I think the proposal was that NAS advertises its support
> > for the new attribute by sending a nul CUI. And, the RADIUS will have
> > the option to reject the request in the absence of the CUI. Do you see
> > any problem with respect to overhead resulting from the CUI
> > advertisement here?
> Overhead is not the issue -- the null CUI attribute will only require 2
The overhead is a potential issue if we are introducing
a precedent that might be followed by many attributes
in the future. The current suggestion seems to be that
_every_ Access-Request contain this advertisement (cf once
per NAS which might be more reflective of capability).
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.