[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Possible issue for clarification -- RADIUS Accounting
Barney Wolff <> supposedly scribbled:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 06:07:40PM -0500, Nelson, David wrote:
>> Since the purpose of the Interim-Update is to provide a snap-shot
>> the accounting statistics at that moment in time, I see no reason
>> the octet counts and session time attributes ought not to be
>> included. Is this potentially an erratum in RFC 2866? Or was
>> good reason to omit these accounting statistics from the
>> Interim-Update messages?
> I believe you are correct, and this was simply an oversight.
I tend to agree, but I think that the oversight )and error) was
actually in RFC 2869, which defines the semantics of the
Interim-Update Acct-Status-Type. I think that the problem could
have been avoided but just including "Updates: RFC 2866" in the
> Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf
> I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the
Hope this helps,
Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be solved by
listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.