[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issue 101: WG Last Call Review
> > There's no need to imagine all things that could happen if a
> > RADIUS server is compromised, but it is IMHO necessary to at
> > least briefly discuss how implementing _this_ document
> > changes the existing situation.
> > Maybe something like this:
> I'm assuming the text you provided would be in addition to what is
> already there? Below, I've merged your text into the
> existing text as an entirely new Security section.
No, the text was intended as a replacement of what's already there.
The existing text is IMHO unnecessary because it doesn't describe any
security considerations of _this_ document. I don't think we need
to repeat what's already said in RFC 2865 and 3579 in every document
that defines a new RADIUS attribute: we just need to describe what
new security considerations this document has (in addition to
those already adequately described in 2865/3579).
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.