AW: AW: RADEXT Milestone revisions

["Tschofenig, Hannes" <hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com>]

Hi Bernard, 

I wasn't aware of this work. It would be good to know whether there is interesting to solve the key management aspect given the limitations of RADIUS. 

Are you (and Glen) going to provide a solution as part of the keywrap work? 

Ciao
Hannes
 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Bernard Aboba
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Februar 2006 18:30
> An: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: RADEXT Milestone revisions
> 
> >There was also the Kerberos & RADIUS draft, but I can't find 
> a link to it, 
> >either.
> 
> Here it is:
> http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-kaushik-radius-sec-ext-06.txt
> 
> Note that this approach was discussed in AAA WG, and rejected 
> in favor of 
> CMS.  However, there was subsequently not enough interest in 
> CMS to proceed. 
>   I believe that the approach described in the document was 
> in the process 
> of being implemented.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>