Re: Diameter compatibility of VLAN-00

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

How would this work?

Fix the typo.

Insert a section 4 that says the following:

4.  Diameter Considerations

  Diameter needs to define identical attributes with the same Type
  values.  The attributes should be available as part of the NASREQ
  application [RFC4005], as well as the Diameter EAP application
  [RFC4072].

Add Informative references to [RFC4005] and [RFC4072].

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of issue: Diameter compatibility of VLAN-00
Submitter name: Greg Weber
Submitter email address: gdweber@cisco.com
Date first submitted: February 21, 2006
Reference: NA
Document: VLAN-00
Comment type: Editorial
Priority: S
Section: NA
Rationale/Explanation of issue:

 In the RADEXT charter, I see:
   "...all RADEXT WG work items MUST contain a Diameter
    compatibility section, outlining how interoperability
    with Diameter will be maintained."

 The VLAN draft does not contain a Diameter compatibility
 section, but does mention (in the abstract) that these
 attributes can be used with Diameter.

Requested change:
 The table of attributes in section 3 shows which attributes
 may be in which RADIUS messages.  Maybe another similar
 table is needed in a Diameter Compatibility section showing
 which Diameter applications/messages may include these attributes.

 Also, I see one typo that wasn't in the previous version :)
   Section 1.3:  'Unsupported Attribute"' ->
                 '"Unsupported Attribute"' (missing double quote).



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>