[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Diameter compatibility of VLAN-00



Are you suggesting havinging Diameter AVP tables in the draft?

John

>> How would this work?
>> 
>> Fix the typo.
>> 
>> Insert a section 4 that says the following:
>> 
>> 4.  Diameter Considerations
>> 
>>    Diameter needs to define identical attributes with the same Type
>>    values.  The attributes should be available as part of the NASREQ
>>    application [RFC4005], as well as the Diameter EAP application
>>    [RFC4072].
>> 
>> Add Informative references to [RFC4005] and [RFC4072].
>
>It might be beneficial to set a more useful and informative 
>precedent than was established with CUI, e.g. which messages 
>in which applications may contain the attribute.  This would 
>seem to be analogous to the rigor of the typical RADIUS 
>attribute table found in most RADIUS drafts.  Disagree?
>
>Greg
>
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------
>> Description of issue: Diameter compatibility of VLAN-00 Submitter 
>> name: Greg Weber Submitter email address: gdweber@cisco.com 
>Date first 
>> submitted: February 21, 2006
>> Reference: NA
>> Document: VLAN-00
>> Comment type: Editorial
>> Priority: S
>> Section: NA
>> Rationale/Explanation of issue:
>> 
>>   In the RADEXT charter, I see:
>>     "...all RADEXT WG work items MUST contain a Diameter
>>      compatibility section, outlining how interoperability
>>      with Diameter will be maintained."
>> 
>>   The VLAN draft does not contain a Diameter compatibility
>>   section, but does mention (in the abstract) that these
>>   attributes can be used with Diameter.
>> 
>> Requested change:
>>   The table of attributes in section 3 shows which attributes
>>   may be in which RADIUS messages.  Maybe another similar
>>   table is needed in a Diameter Compatibility section showing
>>   which Diameter applications/messages may include these attributes.
>> 
>>   Also, I see one typo that wasn't in the previous version :)
>>     Section 1.3:  'Unsupported Attribute"' ->
>>                   '"Unsupported Attribute"' (missing double quote).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with 
>> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>> 
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to 
>radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in 
>a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>