RE: RADEXT WG Last Call on "RADIUS Delegated IPv6 Prefix Attribute"

["Avi Lior" <avi@bridgewatersystems.com>]

I hate to bring this up but the format of this attribute does not adhere
to 2865 nor to the RADIUS Attribute Guidelines recommendation. 

Avi
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 3:02 PM
> To: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RADEXT WG Last Call on "RADIUS Delegated IPv6 Prefix 
> Attribute"
> 
> This is an announcement of RADEXT WG last call on the "RADIUS 
> Delegated-IPv6 Prefix Attribute"
> document, prior to sending this document on to the IESG for 
> consideration as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> The document is available for inspection here:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-delegate
d-prefix-00.txt
> 
> RADEXT WG last call will last until Monday March 27, 2006.  
> Please send your comments to the RADEXT WG list 
> (radiusext@ops.ietf.org) in the format described on the 
> RADEXT Issues List:
> http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/
> 
> Since all RADEXT WG last calls require at least 5 reviewers 
> in order to advance the document, please respond indicating 
> that you have read the document and find it acceptable, even 
> if you have no issues to file.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>
> 

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>