Re: RADEXT WG Last Call on "RADIUS Delegated IPv6 Prefix Attribute"

["Alan DeKok" <aland@ox.org>]

"Glen Zorn \(gwz\)" <gwz@cisco.com> wrote:
> Good argument, except that 3162 nowhere uses the word "type" except as
> the name of an attribute field.  Since RFC 3162 doesn't define any
> types, it seems hard to substantiate your claim of an existing type, let
> alone a standard one.

  <shrug>  Format, syntax, string, type, whatever you call it.  This
document adds nothing new over 3162, and 3162 is standards track.

  To a large extent, format and syntax define type.  Whether the
document says this or not is a different story.

  Alan DeKok.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>