Re: Issue: Attribute concatenation/splitting

["Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>]

Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote:
> Yes, this would work as well: an attribute length 255 would mean that
> the data item continues to the next attribute; 

  If the next attribute exists.

> attribute length less than 255 would indicate the final piece of
> this data item.

  Or, if there is no next attribute.

> The only catch might be that RFC 2865 prohibits string/text attributes
> with length 2 (=string length 0).

  Attributes of length 2 are unnecessary if the above conditions are met.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>