Re: RADIUS Design Guidelines

[Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>]

On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:07:59PM -0700, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote:
> Barney Wolff <> scribbled on Monday, August 28, 2006 1:17 PM:
> 
> ...
> 
> > In order to avoid pathological cases, I would restrict EEA-type=0 to
> > the first instance of EEA-type in an EA-VSA, and only when the
> > previous EA-VSA had Length=253.  The meaning would be that the value
> > indicated by Length2 is to be concatenated with the last EEA in the
> > previous EA-VSA. It would be an error to have a Tag mismatch, an
> > EEA-type=0 not right after the Vendor-Id, or when the previous EA-VSA
> > was not of max length or there was no previous EA-VSA.   
> 
> All  a sudden, stealing a bit from the Tag sounds very simple ;-)

Well, no.  Every condition I listed would apply, just the same, however
one does fragmentation and concatenation.

-- 
Barney Wolff         I never met a computer I didn't like.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>