[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Comments on the draft-ietf-radext-filter-04 or.. -05
Bernard Aboba wrote:
> >Just a small note/question regarding the text stating Filter-ID and
> >NAS-Filter-Rule must not appear in the same message. I don't see
> >this kind of "must" restriction on Diameter side (RFC4005) so why
> >should RADIUS have it?
> Right. Diameter allows both Filter-ID and NAS-Filter-Rule
> AVPs, so adding a usage restriction within RADIUS might result in
> a Diameter -> RADIUS translation issue.
RFC4005 does not define how using both of them would actually work
(e.g. which is applied first).... so IMHO we could keep the
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.