Re: [IANA #46166] Request for allocation of NAS-Port-Type values

["Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>]

RFC 4603 explicitly requested an allocation of values 30-34, which makes me 
wonder whether a vendor isn't already using 27-29.


> From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>
> To: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
> CC: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IANA #46166] Request for allocation of NAS-Port-Type values 
> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:28:39 -0500
>
> "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there any existing usage of values 27-29?
>
>   Not that I can see.
>
>   Alan DeKok.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>