[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new Service-Type
OK, let me explain my point of view.
As this I-D propose new Service-Type values it's means that IETF
Consensus required. It's a real fact.
As to the question about only one implementation using this values so I
propose this attributes because I really hope that it may be useful in
environment where video services (like video-call or video-on-demand)
As recommended by http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.html, chair of
the WG must grant permissions to IETF to publish I-D. But I think that
the utility of this new values need to be discussed by RADext WG
firstly. If this values will be found helpful -- WG can recommend it
for using in suitable situations and publish this I-D to get IETF
Consensus. If not -- WG can discard it.
If its needed to have more examples where this values may be used I will
try to give it.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.