[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Zorn (gwz) [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:07 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); David B. Nelson
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: Continued discussion of RADIUS Crypto-Agility
> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> allegedly
> scribbled on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 10:12 AM:
> > Seriously, I was the one to recommend the author to ask for a time
> > slot on the RADEXT agenda. I believe that the RADSEC work is if not
> > within at least related to the WG scope (but not necessarily as a
> > crypto-agility solution), although undertaking it would mean an
> > extension of the charter.
> OK, I'm confused: the scope of a WG is _not_ defined by its
> charter? If the charter doesn't define the scope of a WG, what does?
Yes, at the same time Working Group meetings and mail lists can discuss
items that are candidates for future work. This includes items that do
not belong strictly within a current charter, but may become part of an
extended charter later.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.