[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt
On Mon 27 Aug 2007, you wrote:
> [gwz] ...
> (b) "Is the level of affirmative response sufficient for this draft to
> become a WG work item?"
> [gwz] Discounting the recent explosion of people (seldom, if ever, heard
> from before) pushing radsec, I suspect that there aren't many more than 4
> people active on this list (even including authors & chairs ;-).
There are many of us who also lurk on the list and prefer to leave the
arguing up to others :-)
I think this draft should be accepted as a WG item.
FWIW I also think that RADSEC should be a WG item also but I am aware that
some people are vehemently against that for reasons that are less
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.