[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt
>Please recall, however, that as a rough rule of thumb the IESG likes to see
>a document thoroughly reviewed and commented upon by six or more
>during WGLC, before it can be sent to the IESG as "publication requested".
>That's why we ask for that level of interest before adopting a draft as a
The call for adoption of a WG work item is separate from the final consensus
determination. In the call for adoption, the goal is to determine if there
are enough people interested and whether there is consensus for adoption.
In determining this, both the opinions voiced on the mailing list and at
IETF 69 need to be taken into account. Given that no dissenting opinions
have been voiced and given the size of both audiences put together, I think
that the adoption requirements have been met.
[gwz] OK, so I'll finish cleaning up the examples in the draft & submit the
new "draft-ietf-radext" version this week.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.