[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Revisions to RFC 4005
Alan DeKok writes...
> That's more work. Do we have an editor for that document, or
> someone willing to shepherd it?
I don't know. We should probably talk to the DIME WG chairs to see if this
could be wrapped into a revision document they are already working on.
> Is the WG against the idea of having suggested practices updating
> holes in previous specs?
It might also meet resistance at the IESG, as a proposed BCP document
attempting to Update a Proposed Standard document, regardless of what the
RADEXT WG feels. Generally speaking this is not permissible. That's why we
needed to make the Issues and Fixes draft a Standards Track document.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.