[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions on modified Extended Attribute format?
Glen Zorn wrote:
> During the meeting last week, I thought that there were a couple of
> questions/comments on Jabber regarding the changes that I proposed to
> the extended attribute format (adding a bit to distinguish between new
> TLVs and legacy RADIUS attributes in extended attributes) but I didn't
> quite catch them. Would those who presented those remarks mind
> repeating them in email? TIA.
WiMAX uses the same attribute format as proposed here. Changes that
are incompatible with WiMAX should be discouraged.
If it's just stealing a bit (which WiMAX doesn't use), that sounds
fine. The ability to group legacy RADIUS attributes via a method other
than tags would be good.
One question: If we DO permit this for legacy RADIUS attributes, what
does the "C" bit mean? Do we use the WiMAX method for splitting
attributes encrypted with the "Tunnel-Password" method?
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.