[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 272 resolution
Glen Zorn wrote:
> Look at RFC 2548, in particular the MS-CHAP*-Response, MS-CHAP-CPW-?, etc.
> attributes. Those are perfect examples of what cannot be done with Extended
> Attributes as currently defined.
They can be carried in legacy RADIUS. The extended types are just
legacy RADIUS attributes with 16-bit types.
Or do you mean de-capsulating the contents of the MS-CHAP-* attributes
into multiple attributes? e.g. MS-CHAP(foo=1, bar=2, ...) 3GPP does
this, WiMAX does this.
I was sure the idea was brought up on this list, too. What was the
result of that discussion?
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.