> In any case, I'm not married to this solution; I've repeatedly requested
> > suggestions for a solution to the problem but nobody else has brought
> > forward.
> Nonsense. There were multiple suggestions offered, including the one
> you are re-proposing. They were all rejected. Some were rejected by you.
Indeed, it is difficult to see how the current proposed resolution is different
a similar suggestion which was rejected after (laborious) WG
consensus calls at IETF 71 as well as on the WG mailing list.
I'm confused! Is this in the way of a recommendation for a
solution or are you just enjoying beating me with the "WG consensus"
stick? If the latter, please have fun, but you might take a moment to redefine
the problem as non-existent by simply deleting the issue from the list. In
any case, I don't really care anymore: I've solved the problem (in a very ugly
way) by defining the attributes for 802.16 PKMv1 support as (complex &
redundant) legacy attributes since I really don't have time for this. You
see, I'm actually trying to do some engineering here; I don't know what
you're trying to do, but I'm pretty sure it's not that.