[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: draft-ietf-radext-status-server-02 editorials (fwd)
Bernard Aboba wrote:
>> Ok... so should it be Experimental, or Informational?
> FWIW, I'd say Informational. That is what we did for RFC 5176, since
> its original implementation had so many warts. Where there were
> potential fixes, we pointed them out, but since the goal was to
> describe what was implemented, we could not break backward
> compatibility by inserting MUST/MUST NOT language to outlaw
> poor practices (e.g. the original specification enabled replay
OK. The next version will be marked "Informational".
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.