[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-zorn-radius-pkmv1-03.txt
Glen Zorn wrote:
> Using Extended Attributes was my first choice but it is unfortunately
> impossible to do this in any reasonable fashion using them; this was
> established as unchangeable WG Consensus some time ago, as announced by Alan
I never said any such thing.
In the past, people rejected the modifications you proposed. This
forms the "WG consensus" that I have referred to.
In the present, no one has agreed to make those modifications.
In the future, if people *do* agree to make those modifications, that
would form "WG consensus", and I would be in no position to oppose it.
> (it _is_ interesting that RFCs can be updated & made obsolete &
> decisions of even the highest courts may be overturned, all based on new
> data, but WG Consensus cannot change -- who knew?).
These spurious claims can't avoid the fact that you haven't succeeded
in changing the WG consensus to support your position. Don't blame me.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.