[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: radius over tcp

To: Ignacio Goyret <igoyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: radius over tcp
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:29:54 -0700
Cc: radiusext@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200903271731.n2RHV2ZA032261@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
References: <200903271731.n2RHV2ZA032261@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)

Ignacio Goyret wrote:
> Any thoughts on using SCTP instead of TCP?

  If there's a demand.

> It solves a lot of the problems mentioned for TCP
> and it handles natively the situation of multihomed
> servers (which TCP doesn't).

  People already use traditional RADIUS over IPSec to get better
transport.  I'm not sure that SCTP adds a large benefit here.

  Alan DeKok.

--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

References:
- radius over tcp
  - From: Ignacio Goyret <igoyret@alcatel-lucent.com>

Prev by Date: draft-zorn-radius-encattr-15: Obsolete?
Next by Date: Re: Issue: RADSEC and DTLS docs
Previous by thread: radius over tcp
Next by thread: Issues update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread