[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FW: COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design





> From: housley@vigilsec.com
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> CC: radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-radext-design@tools.ietf.org; gdweber@gmail.com; aland@freeradius.org
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:27:06 -0700
> Subject: COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design
>
> Comment:
>
> The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo on 8 April 2009 provides some
> editorial suggestions.
>
> ID nits complains that reference [8] appears in Appendix B.6 but not
> in the References.
>
> The Introduction Section should be a non-normative section. However,
> Section 1.1 uses normative statements (RECOMMENDED and NOT
> RECOMMENDED) before those terms are defined in Section 1.3.
>
> The acronym AAA should be expanded.
>
> When referring to the appendixes, I think the draft should talk about
> appendixes, not about sections. For example, it should talk about
> Appendix A.5, not about Section A.5.
>