[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design

To: <aland@freeradius.org>, "'Jari Arkko'" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: RE: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design
From: "Dave Nelson" <d.b.nelson@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 08:49:20 -0400
Cc: <iesg@ietf.org>, <radext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-radext-design@tools.ietf.org>, <gdweber@gmail.com>, "'radext mailing list'" <radiusext@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <4A041C6F.5010900@freeradius.org>
References: <20090507140820.D19BB3A709C@core3.amsl.com> <4A041C6F.5010900@freeradius.org>

> > There are a couple of problems with this. First, if you really mean
> > to change the recommendation, then Updates: RFC 2865 header in the
> > beginning of the document would have been appropriate.
> 
>   We could add that, but I don't think it's critical.

Hmmm.  I have doubts about a BCP updating a Draft Standard.



--
to unsubscribe send a message to radiusext-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/radiusext/>

Prev by Date: RE: Strawman Virtual Interim agenda (+ proposed time/date)
Next by Date: Re: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design
Previous by thread: Re: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design
Next by thread: Re: DISCUSS and COMMENT: draft-ietf-radext-design
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread