[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Jari's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-radext-design-07.txt



> All of these formats are NOT RECOMMENDED. All VSA formats that do
> not follow [RFC2865] are NOT RECOMMENDED. Examples of NOT
> RECOMMENDED formats include Vendor types of more than 8 bits, Vendor
> lengths of less than 8 bits, Vendor lengths of more than 8 bits, and
> Vendor-Specific contents that are not in Type-Length-Value format.

How about this?

All VSA schemes that do not follow the [RFC2865] recommendations
are NOT RECOMMENDED since these formats will typically not be
implementable without RADIUS server code changes.  This includes all
the above formats, as well as Vendor types of more than 8 bits, vendor
lengths of less than 8 bits, vendor lengths of more than 8 bits and
Vendor-Specific contents that are not in Type-Length-Value format.