[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ISSUE: definition of RADIUS IPv6 "data types" arbitrary and unjustified
Adrian Farrel [mailto:Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com] writes:
> Hi Glen,
> Second of your Issue tracker emails to arrive today.
And more to come ;-).
> Is there any
> action you are asking from the IESG, or is this for info?
Yes, I would request the termination of IESG review and return of this
terribly flawed document to the WG. I realize that it's pretty late in the
process, but it seems clear to me (and I hope, given the content of the
messages you mention above) that, despite all the Last Calls, etc., no one
has read this draft really carefully (I know that I hadn't); that, alone,
should keep it off the RFC Editor's queue until it is fixed.
to unsubscribe send a message to email@example.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.