Wojcejech
said:
“At this point
however the draft seems to have been OK'ed in principle by the WG, and
there was no evidence of the draft having "same negative feedback as had
earlier versions" ...”
In
looking through the minutes of the WG meetings I don’t see any indications
that the draft was accepted as a WG work item.
Within
RADEXT WG, adoption requires a formal consensus call, which was subsequently
held (with insufficient interest being displayed so far).
The
IETF 73 minutes do provide an indication of the overall reaction to the
document, which included objections both in principle and with respect to
the specifics.
I
can post the individual comments made as Issues if you like.
At
the Virtual Interim, David Miles proposed an approach for overcoming those
objections and moving the document forward.
Woj> As
per my earlier mail(s):
- could you confirm that what my mail outlined in terms
of moving forward is also your
expectation?
- Are you now convinced of "interest"? (and
if not, or partially, then on what grounds given the rather abundant amount
of contributors, reviewers, discussion?)
- could you
point out (summarise) the issues that were not
addressed?
Thanks.