[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server
Ignacio Goyret wrote:
> IMO, the use of Access-Accept for a use
> *other* than what it has always been intended for is opening
> a can of worms with potentially unintended consequences.
I agree with that. If the document had been a WG item, Status-Server
packets would have had a Status-Response packet.
> However, in the Security section, it should be mentioned that
> both servers and clients can be attacked independently when
> either one supports Server-Status, even if the other doesn't.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.