[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Review of draft-ietf-radext-status-server-05 (Part II)
Ignacio Goyret wrote:
>>> [BA] You might say that the server MUST ignore other attributes.
> Why MUST?
> Shouldn't that be up to the server's local policy?
> What if the server needs/wants to check one of those extra attributes?
> (possibly including vendor-specific attributes)
What are the checks for? The only possible decision that can be made
is whether or not to reply to a Status-Server.
Would it be useful to allow a server to *not* respond, if it saw a VSA
with a particular value?
I could see this being useful for checking "liveliness" of upstream
realms. But some providers have dozens, if not hundreds of realms, and
this functionality gets awkward pretty quickly.
to unsubscribe send a message to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.