Mail Thread Index
- [RRG] Moving the list...,
Tony Li
- [RRG] Re: ILNP Critique,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones... IPv6 RIB burden adding to IPv4 burden in...,
HeinerHummel
- Re: [RRG] Solving the routing scaling problem for internal networks too? Ivi...,
HeinerHummel
- [RRG] Solving the routing scaling problem for internal networks too? Ivip may be able to help,
Robin Whittle
- [RRG] Charging for updates in BGP,
Robin Whittle
- [RRG] Comparing APT & Ivip,
Robin Whittle
- [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Stephen Sprunk
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- RE: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [RRG] Billions of micronets / EID prefixes,
Robin Whittle
- Re: Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Heinrich Hummel
- [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Dan Jen
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Michael Menth
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
He Yan
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Dan Jen
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Dan Jen
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Lan Wang
- RE: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Michael Meisel
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Michael Meisel
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Dan Jen
- Re: [RRG] Separation vs. Elimination,
Robin Whittle
- [RRG] Elegance and the rejection of SHIM6 host-based multihoming,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Noel Chiappa
- [RRG] drafty draft of Dublin RRG meeting minutes,
Lixia Zhang
- [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by current IPv4 users,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Roland Dobbins
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Bruce Curtis
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Roland Dobbins
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Bruce Curtis
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Roland Dobbins
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Wesley George
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Wesley George
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones... IPv6 RIB burden adding to IPv4 burden in the same router?,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Roland Dobbins
- Re: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Wesley George
- RE: [RRG] 2 billion IP cellphones in 2103 & mass adoption of IPv6 by currentIPv4 users,
Tony Li
[RRG] Fast and sparse mapping?,
Robin Whittle
- [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping? aggregated EIDs, OITRDs etc.,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Message not available
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Message not available
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Fast and sparse mapping?,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Commetns about load split in LISP,
Damian Lezama
[RRG] ILNP critique,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] NAT capabilities,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Re: Practical Proposals vs. endless theoretical discussions,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Practical proposals vs. endless theoretical discussions,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Running on Empty: the challenge of managing Internet addresses,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Renumbering and Renumbering,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Lixia Zhang
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Robert Bonomi
- Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: Re: [RRG] Consequences of no renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] "No renumbering" for any networks precludes scalable support for packets from non-upgraded networks,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Consensus reached: renumbering,
Tony Li
[RRG] Splitting the problem,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
[RRG] Stretch in case of LISP+ALT,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] Administrivia: mailing list management,
Tony Li
[RRG] Renumbering once might be OK when converting to Scalable PI (SPI space),
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Portability between mapping providers,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Paper: TTR Mobility Extensions for Core-Edge Separation Solutions,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Alternative to encapsulation: IPv4 ETR Address Forwarding (EAF),
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - question lacks detail,
Robin Whittle
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - 3 kinds of thing which might be renumbered,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Christopher Morrow
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Dale W. Carder
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Christopher Morrow
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Templin, Fred L
- Message not available
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Tim Chown
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Dale W. Carder
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering - missing dimension,
Bruce Curtis
- Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Olivier Bonaventure
RE: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Noel Chiappa
[RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Tony Li
Re: Re: [RRG] Consensus check: renumbering,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] Re: Abstracted Networking APIs,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Re: Providers and Providers,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Re: PI as a non-requirement,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] PI as a non-requirement,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Providers and providers,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Re: Six/One Router: why have bilateral mode? Referrals . . .,
Christian Vogt
[RRG] Six/One Router: why have bilateral mode? Referrals . . .,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Moving towards a new set of Networking APIs,
RJ Atkinson
Re: RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Stephen Sprunk
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Michael Menth
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Brian E Carpenter
- re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Fleischman, Eric
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
David Conrad
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- [RRG] Re: ALT oeprational model,
Eliot Lear
- [RRG] RE: ALT oeprational model,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... mapping,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Roland Dobbins
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Yakov Rekhter
- Huh? Was: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Eliot Lear
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Christian Vogt
- re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering... ACLs etc.,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering... ACL alternatives?,
Pekka Savola
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Weeks
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
David Williamson
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Templin, Fred L
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Stephen Sprunk
- Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
David Conrad
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Tony Li
- Re: Re: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- Re: RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Heinrich Hummel
- RE: [RRG] Renumbering...,
Noel Chiappa
Re: Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RR=,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations Oops: TSO,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Perplexing PMTUD and packet length observations Oops: TSO,
Templin, Fred L
[RRG] Logistics,
Tony Li
RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Noel Chiappa
[RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Sheng Jiang
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Steven Blake
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Brian E Carpenter
- Popping up a level (was Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN),
David Conrad
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Brian Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] On identifiers, was: Re: Does every host need a FQDN,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Steven Blake
- RE: [RRG] Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
[RRG] RE: Logistics preferences...,
Tony Li
[RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Brian Dickson
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Marshall Eubanks
- RE: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Luigi Iannone
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
Benno Overeinder
- Re: [RRG] Logistics preferences...,
David Conrad
[RRG] Ivip6 - Forwarding Label in the Core,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] A new brand of MPLS can do the job,
Heinrich Hummel
[RRG] Short explanation: Ivip6's "Core Routing Label Forwarding",
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Ivip6: number of "Flow Label" bits required,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Ivip6 (previously FLOWv6), Ivip4 and Ivip,
Robin Whittle
Re: [RRG] NAT-PT and other approaches to IPv6 adoption - Dual Stack Lite,
HeinerHummel
[RRG] position paper on resource pooling,
Emmanuel Baccelli
[RRG] paper on separation of locators and identifiers,
Aaron Falk
[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
xuxiaohu 41208
- RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Christian Vogt
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Lixia Zhang
- re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Does every host need a FQDN name in the future?//re:[RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Lixia Zhang
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian Dickson
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Templin, Fred L
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Noel Chiappa
- RE: [RRG] draft-rja-ilnp-intro-01.txt,
Noel Chiappa
[RRG] FLOWv6: IPv6 Flow Label to control DFZ forwarding,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Six/One Router revised 2008-07-12,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Agenda changes...,
Tony Li
[RRG] LISP home page www.lisp4.net,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Business incentives for LISP PTRs and Ivip OITRDs,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Map-encap, fragmentation, PMTUD etc.,
Robin Whittle
Re: [RRG] Mapping Distribution and Management: contribution for comments,
HeinerHummel
vulnerability of being attacked//RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
xuxiaohu 41208
[RRG] GLI-Split,
Michael Menth
[RRG] Design Taxonomy/Analysis for Address-Indirection-Based Solutions,
Christian Vogt
[RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
William Herrin
- RE: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Luigi Iannone
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] thoughts on the design space 4: encapsulate vs. translate,
Olivier Bonaventure
[RRG] thoughts on the design space 3: caching,
Jari Arkko
[RRG] thoughts on the design space 2: upper layer implications,
Jari Arkko
[RRG] thoughts on the design space 1: the space,
Jari Arkko
[RRG] Review of ILNP -- plus a new idea,
Christian Vogt
[RRG] a new (not few) draft towards convergence,
Lixia Zhang
[RRG] FIB challenges, RIB, BGP, DRAM limitations,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Abstraction action boundary & geo-aggregation router behavior,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Searching the RRG archives at mail-archive.com,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?,
William Herrin
re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?,
Xu Xiaohu
Re: [RRG] Opportunistic Topological Aggregation in the RIB->FIB Calculation?,
Jari Arkko
[RRG] a few draft towards convergence,
Lixia Zhang
[RRG] Question about Six/One host and router,
Flinck, Hannu (NSN - FI/Espoo)
[RRG] RRG scope avoids practical concerns,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Ricardo Oliveira
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Robin Whittle
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Peter Sherbin
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Peter Sherbin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Brian Dickson
- Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- Geo RIB-FIB compression, was: Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Ricardo Oliveira
- [RRG] Re: Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
William Herrin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
HeinerHummel
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
HeinerHummel
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
Scott Weeks
- Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing is at odds with reality,
HeinerHummel
[RRG] Discussions in Dublin,
Tony Li
[RRG] Publicly available LISP and shim6 implementations,
Olivier Bonaventure
[RRG] Does LISP 3 use the cache mechanism on ITR for the EID-to-RLOC mapping?,
Dongxiao Xu
[RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Darrel Lewis (darlewis)
- [RRG] Current drafts,
louise.burness
- Re: [RRG] Current drafts,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Current drafts,
Luigi Iannone
- Re: [RRG] Current drafts,
Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [RRG] Current drafts,
Luigi Iannone
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Drake, John E
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Pekka Savola
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Pekka Savola
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Lixia Zhang
- Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
David Meyer
- Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
David Meyer
- Re: [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Difference between translation in LISP vs. Six/One Router -- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- RE: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Christian Vogt
- Re: [RRG] Six/One Router Design Clarifications,
Lixia Zhang
[RRG] A Late Response to Questions on Six/One Router,
Christian Vogt
[RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
William Herrin
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
Robert Bonomi
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
Re: [RRG] Geographic aggregation-based routing,
HeinerHummel
[RRG] Terminology,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
RJ Atkinson
- RE: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Jari Arkko
- [RRG] Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Xu Xiaohu
- [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Tony Li
- re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Xu Xiaohu
- RE: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
William Herrin
- re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [RRG] RE: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Brian E Carpenter
- [RRG] Re: Is the flat identifier acceptable,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
William Herrin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: re: [RRG] IEEE EUI-64 as an Identifier format,
Hongbin Luo
[RRG] perceived privacy issue,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Possible Identifier Properties,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Terminology redux,
RJ Atkinson
[RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Scott Brim
- RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
William Herrin
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Tony Li
- [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Christian Vogt
- [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Scott Brim
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Christian Vogt
- [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Brian Dickson
- RE: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Tony Li
- Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Brian Dickson
- Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Brian Dickson
- Re: [RRG] Abstraction of problem space,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
William Herrin
- re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Xu Xiaohu
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Lixia Zhang
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
RJ Atkinson
- [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
RJ Atkinson
- Re: [RRG] Re: Should the identifier be used as local locator,
Noel Chiappa
[RRG] LISP-ALT's long path problem again,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Jari Arkko
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Robin Whittle
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Dino Farinacci
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
David Meyer
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
David Meyer
- RE: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Templin, Fred L
- Re: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Dino Farinacci
- RE: [RRG] EXPLISP BOF at the Dublin IETF,
Templin, Fred L
[RRG] Not separate namespaces: Loc-ID-separation, map-encap etc.,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Take 2: AA, BB, CC,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] IPv4: how bad, when to fix?,
Robin Whittle
[RRG] Long term clean-slate only for the RRG?,
Robin Whittle