Notice: Undefined variable: raticle_ordinal in /usr/home/dlamkins/public_html/lamkins-guitar/struct-links.phpi on line 25
http://lamkins-guitar.com/music/article/best-MB-amp
David Lamkins picked up his first guitar a long time ago. As best he can recall the year was 1967: the year of the Summer of Love. Four decades later David has conjured up an amalgam of folk, rock and jazz solo guitar music for the occasional intimate Portland audience.
LCW on Bandcamp
location: Portland, OR USA

Facets: Mesa/Boogie, comparison, review, @musings info
Loading...

On "the best" Mesa/Boogie amplifier

Oh, man... Isn't this just a matter of personal preference? Mesa/Boogie makes a lot of different amps to appeal to different players. If I tell you that I like their vintage-sounding amps more than the modern-sounding amps, it says nothing at all about whether one is better than the other.

I've owned* or played all of these Mesa/Boogie amps:

I may have forgotten some. (It helps that I have a M/B dealer within walking distance of the office.) They're all good amps.

My least favorite was the Solo 50 head through the 4x12 Recto cab. I found that to have too much emphasis on the low-mids for my taste.

Next on the list of least favorites would have to be the Nomad. Their high-gain channels are too thin sounding for me, and the reverb just doesn't sound as good as on M/B's other amps.

I like the DC-5 as a nice "borderline" amp - it does a competent job of straddling the line between old-school and new-school sounds.

For blues, the Blue Angel is tops. Not a great practice amp, though.

For warm clean and crunch sounds, the Heartbreaker is great.

The Maverick is really good for pop / psychedelic / shoegaze styles. It doesn't have the headroom of the big-bottle amps.

The Mark IV works well for prog and jazz and lots of other genres; it's incredibly flexible. I don't like its crunch sound as much as I like the Hearbreaker's crunch, though.

 

So, what was the question?

July 13 2003 07:34:39 GMT