[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt (fwd)

To: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>
Subject: RE: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt (fwd)
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: aaa-doctors@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <A675D99D53706742B50619249A8EBF04FE27CD@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com>
References: <A675D99D53706742B50619249A8EBF04FE27CD@MAANDMBX2.ets.enterasys.com>

> How is feedback from the MIB Doctors handled?  My understanding is that
> the AAA Doctors group was supposed to operate in a similar fashion.

Not sure how feedback is handled from MIB doctors, but there is an O&M
Directorate list on which a similar procedure operates -- AD posts a
request for a review, list members respond, AD collates (potentially
anonymizing feedback on request) and inserts in Draft Tracker.

In any case, I've collated references to the feedback and tried to
summarize the issues that were raised.  If I missed something, let me
know.

References:
- RE: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt (fwd)
  - From: "Nelson, David" <dnelson@enterasys.com>

Prev by Date: Summary of feedback on draft-ietf-dhc-agent-opt-radius-06.txt
Next by Date: Comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-dhcp-over-ike-radius-00.txt
Previous by thread: RE: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt (fwd)
Next by thread: RE: FW: Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-agentopt-radius-06.txt (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread